Home > Uncategorized > FT Alphaville » Why it doesn’t matter if China sells its USTs

FT Alphaville » Why it doesn’t matter if China sells its USTs

September 9, 2012 Leave a comment Go to comments

As Krugman notes:

What China does by buying bonds is add to the excess savings — which makes our situation worse. (This is just another way of saying that the artificial trade surplus hurts our economy — just another way of stating the same thing). And we want them to do less of it; far from fearing that they will stop, we should welcome the prospect.

In our opinion, this is one of the most important points about China at the moment.

Not only are global flow dynamics pushing China into a situation where it may finally release some of the Treasuries it holds, doing so would be hugely beneficial to the US.

And just so the Krugman bashers don’t get too excited that this is only his uniquely contrarian view, we spotted a note from John Higgins at Capital Economics which argues a similar point, though he comes at it from a different angle.

In Higgins’ mind China never played a role in depressing long-term US Treasury yields. After all, he notes, if this was not true, why then would yields have remained so low in recent years, during which time China’s surplus savings have fallen?

We, of course, are inclined to think that China’s surplus savings did play a big role in depressing yields earlier in the naughties, and were probably the key factor behind Greenspan’s famous conundrum.

The reason why yields have stayed low despite China’s surplus savings falling is most likely, in our opinion, because Chinese savings demand is being crowded out by savings demand from US and foreign investors more widely.

What’s more, it is this switch in UST demand — money which might otherwise be going towards maintaining China’s trade surplus — which is now reversing flows, and helping to suck up Treasuries out of China.

In short, investors outside of China are outbidding the Chinese when it comes to USTs. And with a natural negative interest rate, there’s really very little incentive for them to keep fighting for the opportunity to invest, especially given the lack of new money they have to invest anyway.

And it is in this context that Higgins makes a very good point. Whatever the causes and effects on yields, the key consequence of Chinese surplus savings has been the exportation of disinflation:

For all that, we do think there has been an important indirect effect on Treasuries from China’s surplus savings. This is because such savings have kept the level of aggregate demand and inflation in the rest of the world – including in the US – lower than would otherwise have been the case. In turn, this may have influenced the Fed’s monetary policy stance, which is the primary determinant of Treasury yields.

In short, it was the disinflation — or possibly even deflation — which China was exporting for so long, which drove the Fed to maintain rates at such low levels. In other words, because the Chinese were saving their wealth rather than spending it, aggregate demand was being pent up on their shores.

Without the ability to keep saving, all that pent up demand now stands to be released to the rest of the world. That’s to say, China will have to start redeeming the UST ‘coupons’ it holds because it is no longer in a position where foreign demand for its goods allows it to stay a net saver after external costs are accounted for.

China will, of course, try to stimulate domestic demand to stop this happening. But if this doesn’t work — because there are arguably too many goods being produced in China for them to be sold profitably at home, and because external costs are getting too high — it may just end up stockpiling ever more finished products, or declaring  ‘price majeure‘ one too many times for international comfort levels.

Which means, short of giving away goods for free — or there being a massive shift in global investor sentiment — China will have no option but to start spending Treasuries, if not (eventually) funding itself through its own capital deficit.

Something which would not only help China, but aggregate demand in the rest of the world too.

via FT Alphaville » Why it doesn’t matter if China sells its USTs.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: